A soaking mistake: Rishi Sunak's ill-fated election call

In a seismic shift in UK politics, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made the unprecedented and potentially catastrophic move of calling a snap general election for July. This decision has sent shockwaves through his party and the political landscape, leaving many to ponder the motives behind this high-stakes gamble.

Having recently met with well-placed sources in SW1, I can confidently say that the mood within the Conservative Party is one of confusion and concern.

"It's amateur hour," confided one insider, who pointed out Sunak has never had to navigate the treacherous waters of a competitive general election campaign. Worse still, he appears to be surrounded by a team of "political softies" who lack the necessary experience and grit to steer the ship through the coming storm.

It's worth noting that these alarming revelations came to light a whole week before Sunak's fateful decision to call the election. The writing, it seems, was already on the wall.

The campaign reveals the stark reality of Sunak's inexperience and questionable judgment. By making himself the focal point, he has left the Conservative Party in a perilous state, with candidates reportedly left to fend for themselves and party unity at an unprecedented low.

The harsh reality of politics is that the smartest and most intelligent candidates rarely come out on top. Instead, success often hinges on a complex mix of charisma, timing, and sheer luck. Sunak, having failed to secure victory over Liz Truss in the party leadership contest, should have been acutely aware of this fact.

As the Conservatives face the prospect of a potentially devastating defeat, the party is scrambling to secure a minimum of seats while also preparing for a future beyond this election. This future is shrouded in uncertainty, potentially necessitating a complete rebranding and reshuffling of the party's leadership.

In the end, the adage holds that you either win or lose in politics. There is no middle ground, no consolation prize. By calling this ill-fated election, Rishi Sunak may have sealed his fate and that of his party. Only time will tell if the Conservative Party can dry out from this soaking and rebuild or if this soaking mistake will haunt them for a decade.

-- Marc

Marc A. Ross | Chief Communications Strategist @ Caracal

Marc A. Ross is a geostrategist and world-class communications executive with a proven ability to shape public affairs and increase cause awareness for global business issues using global street smarts coupled with holistic, high-frequency, and high-low communications.

Geopolitics is disrupting every business and industry. Caracal is here to help.

Let's get to work.

More emerging concerns at OpenAI

OpenAI is at the forefront of AI technology, namely developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) — a form of AI that could perform any intellectual task that a human being can — pressing ethical and safety concerns emerge.

As reported by Kevin Roose of the New York Times, a group of both current and former OpenAI employees voiced concerns regarding the organization's focus and commitment to safe AI.

They argue that in the rush to make OpenAI the leader in the AGI race, the company's leadership might have sidestepped sufficient measures to prevent potential downsides or dangers of AI systems.

Daniel Kokotajlo, a former researcher in OpenAI's governance division and a lead voice in this group, believes that AGI will become a reality by 2027.

This accelerated timeline further underscores their worries, suggesting that safety needs to catch up to innovation and that safety has taken a backseat in the pursuit of growth and profit.

This sentiment from within one of the leading AI organizations sparks a crucial industry-wide conversation about the balance between innovation, profit, and ethical responsibility.

Also, this reporting from the same article is not a helpful tactic by any company: "A Google spokesman declined to comment."

Declining to comment is the ultimate irresponsible move, especially for a company as well-staffed and important as Google.

The promise and peril of AI technology present challenges and opportunities for C-suite executives and senior communications professionals. The challenge lies in integrating robust ethical considerations into strategic planning, particularly as these technologies can significantly disrupt market dynamics and societal norms. The opportunity, however, is to lead by example in setting global standards for responsible AI development that other companies could follow.

The concerns raised by this group serve as a crucial checkpoint for all stakeholders involved in AGI development. As companies venture into these uncharted territories, engaging in a substantive dialogue on aligning tech-driven ambitions with societal and ethical responsibilities is vital.

Enjoy the ride + plan accordingly.

-Marc

Can AI make VAR better?

The Premier League has been at the forefront of harnessing technology to make match days better for fans, players, and even referees, from utilizing video assistant referee (VAR) technology, which expedites decision-making processes and reduces game stoppages, to goal-line technology, which ensures quick and accurate goal determinations, minimizing delays caused by disputes. Additionally, wearable tracking devices on players provide real-time performance data to coaches and physios, enabling them to make faster tactical adjustments during matches.

Now AI-enabled 'force fields' to speed up offside calls in the Premier League.

Well, that is the hope anyway.

According to The Times, the Premier League will use this cutting-edge system, which harnesses artificial intelligence and "force fields," to streamline offside decisions for the upcoming season.

To reduce delays, the Premier League has struck a deal with Second Spectrum, an American software company owned by Genius Sports, to provide the technology for their semi-automated offside system.

Instead of relying on traditional limb-tracking methods, Second Spectrum's Dragon system captures 10,000 "surface mesh data points" per player, updating 200 times per second, ensuring unparalleled accuracy in determining offside positions.

The FIFA-approved system will replace the current Hawk-Eye system, which involves manually drawing lines on a screen for a video assistant referee (VAR), often leading to delays of two minutes or more.

Second Spectrum says thier AI technology will automatically detect when attackers are offside when the ball is kicked, generating accurate lines within seconds. An image will then be provided to the VAR, who will determine whether the attacker is interfering with play.

By utilizing "mesh" data, the system will effectively create an invisible "force field" around each player. When this "force field" is breached by a part of an attacker's body capable of scoring a goal, an offside message is triggered.

Premier League officials are confident that the semi-automated offside system will significantly reduce delays in offside decisions. The league is aiming for an average reduction of 31 seconds per call.

-Marc