Six days into the expanded Iran war, the pattern is becoming clear. Operationally, the strikes are succeeding beyond expectations. A US submarine launched its first torpedo in combat since World War II, sinking an Iranian warship off Sri Lanka. Intelligence-driven targeting is destroying Iranian missile capabilities faster than Tehran can regenerate them. Ground forces are not yet committed. This is an air-dominated campaign working largely as designed.
However, the situation is unraveling strategically and politically.
Trump's decision-making process has become a liability. The New York Times reports that his national security advisers are struggling to keep pace with his impulses. Decisions come fast. Contradictions abound. There is little preparation for how things can go wrong. This is not the deliberation that precedes sustained military operations. This is reactive crisis management at the presidential level.
Consider what's happening simultaneously. The Pentagon is now using Anthropic's Claude AI to identify and prioritize military targets in real time. Yet the same Pentagon just declared Anthropic a supply-chain risk for objecting to unrestricted AI weaponization. This created a cascade: Anthropic lost credibility on defense, OpenAI gained it, and now Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is forced back into negotiations to avoid complete marginalization. The AI industry is being fractured between those willing to support military applications without reservation and those trying to maintain a principled stance. Commercial pressure is winning. This tells you something about how unstructured militarization works.
The Iran war has also exposed something Trump promised voters to prevent: an extended military commitment without a clear endgame. He campaigned against endless wars. Days into this one, there is no credible narrative about how it concludes. Does regime change happen? Does it not? Does the conflict expand to Russia and China? Nobody is saying. Trump is improvising.
Meanwhile, China just announced its lowest growth target since 1991. Beijing is signaling that the old growth model is broken. This is geopolitically significant because it suggests China's capacity for international economic competition and capital deployment is declining at the exact moment that America is ramping up its Middle East commitments. For corporate executives, this creates an unusual window: reduced Chinese competition in some sectors, but also reduced Chinese appetite for M&A and capital partnerships.
The Iran war is creating three immediate problems for Trump:
First, the conflict is validating Democratic warnings about Republican fiscal recklessness. Data center energy subsidies, military operations in the Middle East, and rising utility costs are colliding at a moment when voters are angry about the cost of living. Trump promised to cut electricity prices in half. Instead, they rose 6% in 2025. Now he is pledging corporate commitments to cover data center energy costs. This is paying protection money to avoid political backlash. It signals weakness.
Second, Gulf allies are being forced to choose sides. Iran attacked them directly. They are now burning through American air-defense interceptors at a rate that exposes their vulnerability. This dependency creates leverage for both Washington and Tehran. Gulf states are weighing whether closer US alignment is worth the risk of Iranian retaliation. That calculation is not obvious, particularly if Trump's support wavers.
Third, JD Vance's silence on the Iran war is ominous. The leading 2028 successor candidate has long opposed foreign military entanglements. His public comment on Trump's Iran strategy is minimal. If Vance distances himself from the war during the 2026 midterms, it opens a fracture in Trump's coalition. A war that succeeds operationally but fails politically is unsustainable.
Your company is now operating in an environment where operational military success no longer guarantees strategic victory. That requires intelligence about what comes next.
Enjoy the ride + plan accordingly.
-Marc
********
Marc A. Ross is a geopolitical strategist, communications advisor, and founder of Caracal Global.
He serves Fortune 1000 companies and private equity firms as a fractional Chief Geopolitical Officer — providing the executive-level geopolitical intelligence and strategic analysis organizations need without the full-time hire.
He is also writing Globalization and American Politics: How International Economics Redefined American Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics.
Subscribe to the Caracal Global Daily at caracal.global/contact.
