Business Schools Need to Teach Less Math and Management and Teach More Policy and Politics

DiplomaticCourier.jpg

Marc A. Ross
Diplomatic Courier
August 31, 2017

Nearly 200 years ago in 1819, the Ecole Spéciale de Commerce et d’Industrie (now ESCP Europe) in Paris established what is widely recognized as the world’s first business school.

Sixty-two years later in 1881, the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Business School was established as the first collegiate school of business in the United States. And it wasn’t until 1948 when the Ivey Business School at the University of Western Ontario in Canada was the first college outside of the United States to offer an MBA program. One year later, 25 students enrolled in the MBA program offered by the University of Pretoria’s Graduate School of Management in South Africa.

Now, of course, the MBA degree is a global phenomenon and offered at hundreds of business schools around the world in both developed and emerging markets. Captains of industry, visionary entrepreneurs and even a handful of elected politicians and diplomats hold this advanced degree.

However much of the course work has changed little. Sure there may be more case studies these days. More and more schools are partnering to offer global immersions and study abroad programs. Also, there has been an expansion of coursework to support softer management skills like developing a high-performing culture, business ethics, and human resource management.

What is missing from the course catalog I fear is not enough classes to prepare future executives to manage a more engaged political and globalized world. The world that every day is at the intersection of global business and global policy. It is time for business schools to teach less math and management and more policy and politics.

Globalization has significantly changed the nature of global politics and the demands placed on business to ensure civil stability and services in domestic and foreign markets. Without knowledge and an advanced educational foundation, how future business executives proceed in this new environment is a risky unknown.

Just the election of Donald Trump alone has uniquely changed the liberal world order into something entirely different than it was just four years ago. In the short term, America’s politics will spill around the world forcing business and civic leaders to manage a shifting and a never seen before business environment. As Trump attempts to redefine America’s role in a liberal world order, how does a global business executive lead a multinational organization lacking a clear understanding of populism, election, and the whims of voters? Without a foundation of study in history and economics and an over-reliance on the scientific management of business, future business leaders will be ill prepared to handle the challenge.

Graduates.jpg

With an endless news cycle, a continuous flow of global trade, protectionist laws, and committed geopolitical powers, global politics and global business is being shaped from many directions and far beyond a nation’s borders and a company’s boardroom. Decisions made in Beijing now affect events in Brussels which in turn compels policy in Ottawa and then again impacting Santiago.

The ability to manage this dynamic, globalized political environment, particularly at the intersection of public policy global business, coupled with an underlying cultural phenomenon rejecting the establishment, this new environment is more challenging for business leaders and global companies.

The pace involved in addressing global business challenges has increased as well as, with the scale of the problems expanding to an ever-growing globally diverse network of stakeholders. Disenfranchised and left-behind voters around the world have spoken and demanded a greater share of the profits. The traditional capitalist ideal of being responsible solely to shareholders in under threat and business going forward will involve numerous stakeholders, including governments, media, bloggers, consumers, non-governmental organizations, investors, employees, and citizens.

For future business leaders, simply put, there are a lot more people that will hold you accountable and want a say in the process. Having a genius marketing plan and solid accounting skills won’t be enough.

The time is now for MBA programs to recognize this challenging global public affairs environment. It is critical that classes utilize case studies that explore the nexus between multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations, government officials, institutions, investors, and recent elections.

World-class business leaders will need to excel with a foundation of fundamental business management skills, but they must be equally deft at grasping the intersection of history, politics, geography, culture, and economics to manage this new global business paradigm.

MBA programs must prepare future business leaders with the hard and soft skills to understand and engage global problems, comprehend economic development challenges and opportunities, and connect how these issues spread in a globally interconnected marketplace all influencing and disrupting global politics and global business like never before.

About the author: Marc A. Ross is the founder of Caracal Global, a strategy firm specializing in global business communications, an adjunct professor at George Washington University teaching a course on Globalization and American politics, and former communications director for the US-China Business Council. Ross holds an MBA from UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School.

What Alibaba can learn from Argentina

Alibaba looks wonderful until you realize it is protected from Amazon in its home market of China.

Is Jack Ma up to the challenge of Jeff Bezos? 

Possibly. 

But we will really never know. 

How to properly manage the balance between protection and competition has been a challenge for governments for centuries. 
 
Leaders know the steps you take to build a modern, world-class economy matters - do you protect it with subsidies and limiting market access or do you challenge it with trade and open market access?

Time and again those nations that challenge their home companies to be competitive globally are they most prosperous and most successful. Germany, the United States, Britain, Japan, and Italy are all prime examples.

In the 1930s, Argentina ranked among the ten richest in the world, after the likes of Australia, Britain and the United States, but ahead of France, Germany, and Italy. With all the benefits of land, natural resources, and immigration, Argentina should have been able to maintain its position on this table and even possibly overtake the United States.
 
As it now stands, we know how this turned out for each country. 
 
One chose protectionism and the other selected competition. 

China and the leadership of Alibaba should consider Argentina to grasp that what looks good and sensible today may not last forever.

Marc A. Ross is an adjunct professor at George Washington University teaching a course on Globalization and American politics, the founder of Caracal Global and Brigadoon, and former communications director for the US-China Business Council. You can follow him on Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn.

How Trump won, in two dimensions

A study shows the 2016 electorate was more socially than economically conservative.

The crucial differences between the two parties came down to social concerns, including pride in America, immigration, and especially moral issues such as abortion and gay marriage. The social-conservative awakening that helped elect Mr. Trump came when voters recognized that the liberal agenda amounted to something more than a shield to protect sexual minorities. It was also a sword to be used against social conservatives. 

Full Wall Street Journal Op-Ed from F.H. Buckley here.