The ridiculousness of Trump's 2025 trade war

Trump's legal justification for his 2025 trade war is both unprecedented and legally tenuous.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board analysis was even more succinct than mine: "Trump's justification for this economic assault on the neighbors makes no sense."

Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to execute this 2025 trade war with Canada, Mexico, and China.

President Carter signed the IEEPA into law in 1977 to grant executive authority over emergencies during peacetime. The IEEPA permits the president to deal with unusual and extraordinary threats to national security by reforming the United States' economic policies.

The IEEPA has been used, for example, to punish Iran during the hostage crisis, North Korea in an effort to slow that nation's nuclear proliferation, and Venezuela for human rights violations.

In nearly every case where the US government has used the IEEPA to hamper a nation, specific property of persons engaged in destabilizing activities and various forms of commerce involved in activities determined to be detrimental to US national security have been targeted. Never has an entire nation's exports to the US been subjected to a blanket tariff. Such a blanket tariff—a universal tax on all imports from a country—represents an unprecedented expansion of IEEPA's scope.

Repeat: no president has previously used the IEEPA to enact tariffs.

Trump is using the illegal cross-border drug trade as his excuse for this trade war. But make no mistake: He has made clear that he likes tariffs for their own sake. During his campaigning last fall in Michigan, Trump said, "Tariffs are the greatest thing ever invented." During his previous administration, he called himself "Tariff Man."

In the run-up to this 2025 trade war, Trump posted on Canada and Mexico: "We don't need the products that they have. We have all the oil you need. We have all the trees you need, meaning the lumber."

Shockingly, this statement is false. On oil alone, NBC News reports that the US imports some 4 million barrels of Canadian crude daily, 70% of which is processed by refiners in the Midwest. It also imports over 450,000 barrels of Mexican oil daily.

Less than a fortnight into this new reign as president, Trump has been on a media tear, forcing himself into all daily headlines. I have noticed that when a media outing doesn't go swimmingly for him, or the headlines are dismal, he pivots and generates chaos elsewhere to distract and create new headlines, new storylines, and new political reality theatre. Cosplay is his safe place. This pattern of manufacturing distractions has become his default tactic.

Trump's 2025 trade war exemplifies his familiar pivot-and-distract strategy. Rather than deliver a presidential address or face media questions, he announced this major economic policy as casually as sending a tweet, displaying the impulsiveness that has become his trademark.

This disgruntled and petulant attitude is a danger when it comes from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, not only for his fellow American citizens but for the world at large. Chaos is not a desired state for the US president.

As the Financial Times editorial board wrote: "Yet the trade war is symptomatic of a larger issue in Trump’s America. The president alone decides which issues are important, exaggerates the diagnosis, and chooses the medicine. As with his attempts to impose his own priorities by firing federal workers and freezing grants, the tools are often blunt. His trade war threatens to be disastrous, but the chaos will not end there.

Preach.

And what about Trump simply ignoring a deal he crafted and signed because he is too lazy and inept at using the tools of diplomacy and soft power of America to redesign a world that takes into account numerous stakeholders? What nation, CEO, or governor would be dumb enough ever to trust Trump again?

So dumb.

As the Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote: "None of this is supposed to happen under the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that Mr. Trump negotiated and signed in his first term. America's willingness to ignore its treaty obligations, even with friends, won’t make other countries eager to do deals. Maybe Mr. Trump will claim victory and pull back if he wins some token concessions. But if a North American trade war persists, it will qualify as one of the dumbest in history."

In the short term, I am confident court action will likely be taken to block these tariffs and save Trump from himself. Just like a federal district court judge rightly blocked Trump's birthright citizenship order and saved him further constitutional embarrassment - these tariffs will see a similar block.

However, the long-term damage from Trump's 2025 trade war will be deep and lasting. The consequences extend beyond mere economics: our closest allies' trust in U.S. commitments is eroding, while global markets must now contend with the possibility of radical policy shifts triggered by presidential whim rather than careful deliberation.

No president has escaped DC's gravity, and with a more interconnected global market and political system, it is hard to see how Trump's 2025 trade war can be considered anything but ridiculous.

Enjoy the ride + plan accordingly.

-Marc

Marc A. Ross | Chief Communications Strategist @ Caracal

Sound More Interesting at Cocktails Memo | January 31

Here are 25 talking points for better conversation at cocktails from news of the past week.

1. King Charles became the first British head of state to visit Auschwitz, to mark the 80th anniversary of its liberation.

2. China is set for a great reshuffling of local government ranks this year; roughly one-fifth of China’s local leaders are due to retire in 2025.

3. Brexit: A YouGov survey found just 3 in 10 Brits still think it was right to leave the EU.

4. Prostate cancer is now the most common form of cancer in England, according to NHS data. There were 55,000 cases in 2023, up 25% on five years before.

5. France reclaimed the Bocuse d’Or, a fine-dining competition.

6. 11 Baltic cables have been damaged in 15 months.

7. Denmark announces $2 billion Arctic security plan.

8. 92: The number of vessels that navigated Russia’s Northern Sea Route last year, up from 19 in 2016.

9. The EU AI Act’s first provisions take effect February 2.

10. Gen AI use: A recent Google-Ipsos survey across 21 countries found that 80 per cent of Gen AI users use it for communications and writing.

11. Vatican warns of AI evils, from deepfakes to ‘enslavement’: The church has issued a 13,000-word document warning governments about the potential consequences of emerging technology.

12. US Copyright Office declared Wednesday that the use of artificial intelligence tools to assist in the creative process does not undermine the copyright of a work.

13. Meta plans to invest as much as $65 billion on projects related to artificial intelligence in 2025.

14. Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly hunting for a home in Washington, DC.

15. WP: The 5 Democrats who make the most sense for 2028

5. John Fetterman

4. Kamala Harris

3. Pete Buttigieg

2. Gretchen Whitmer

1. Josh Shapiro

16. Union membership fell in 2024, hitting new low: Tthe share of American workers in unions dropped to 9.9 percent last year.

17. Project 2025: More than 30 out of Trump’s 47 initial executive actions as of Thursday afternoon match or partially align with ideas promoted in Project 2025.

18. Trump to address Congress on March 4: House Speaker Mike Johnson invited President Donald Trump to address a joint session of Congress on March 4.

19. Google says it will change Gulf of Mexico to ‘Gulf of America’ in Maps app after government updates.

20. Spotify says it paid out $10 billion to the music industry in 2024 alone.

21. Super Bowl ads hit an eye-watering $8 million for 30-seconds.

22. Parlay bets delivered about 56% of sports-betting revenue after payouts for companies in the three states during that period, up from 50% in the same stretch of 2021.

23. Total online gambling revenues in the US is expected to reach $63 billion by 2030.

24. The NWSL has officially announced Denver as its 16th franchise.

25. At least five skiers have been killed in two avalanches in the French alps.

Enjoy the ride + plan accordingly.

-Marc

The AI governance gap: It is time for balanced oversight

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) demands our immediate attention as business leaders. Recent findings from Corporate Europe Observatory reveal a concerning imbalance in AI governance that should give us pause: over 55% of Europe's AI standards committee members represent corporate or consulting interests, mirroring similar patterns in the US.

As a global business navigating the AI revolution, you can see the tremendous opportunities and responsibilities ahead of you. The statistics are clear: According to recent polling, 79% of Americans support strict AI regulation. Regulation isn't just about compliance; it's about sustainable business leadership in an era where technology increasingly shapes society.

The current landscape presents a paradox: while tech giants lead crucial innovations in AI, their dominance in setting standards raises legitimate concerns about oversight. Major tech corporations have faced significant challenges with data privacy and information integrity despite their innovation capabilities. This track record underscores why diverse perspectives in AI governance are beneficial and essential.

What's at stake isn't merely regulatory compliance but the future of AI integration in global business. As leaders of multinational organizations, you must ask: Are we comfortable with a framework where industry giants effectively write their own rules? How can we ensure our AI adoption strategies balance innovation with responsible governance?

The solution lies in embracing a more inclusive approach to AI governance.

Global business leaders can create more robust and sustainable AI standards by supporting the integration of academic expertise, civil society insights, and public interest perspectives alongside industry knowledge. This isn't about impeding progress but ensuring that AI technological advancement aligns with societal values and long-term business sustainability.

Companies that champion responsible AI development will increasingly have a competitive advantage. As global business leaders, you can uniquely shape this trajectory. By advocating for balanced oversight now, you can help create a global AI ecosystem that serves both business interests and the broader public good.

The path forward requires proactive leadership from the global business community. Let's move beyond the false choice between innovation and oversight and advance an AI framework where both can thrive.

-Marc